Gepostet vor 3 Monaten, 12 Tagen in
An der Uni Washington findet demnächst das (weltweit erste?) Seminar über die Identifizierung von Bullshit statt. Jetzt ist es für uns hier eher schwierig, ein Seminar der Uni Washington zu besuchen, aber die haben auch den kompletten Lehrplan inklusive Links zu akademischen Urtexten über Bullshit und Fallstudien online gestellt.
The world is awash in bullshit. Politicians are unconstrained by facts. Science is conducted by press release. So-called higher education often rewards bullshit over analytic thought. Startup culture has elevated bullshit to high art. Advertisers wink conspiratorially and invite us to join them in seeing through all the bullshit, then take advantage of our lowered guard to bombard us with second-order bullshit. The majority of administrative activity, whether in private business or the public sphere, often seems to be little more than a sophisticated exercise in the combinatorial reassembly of bullshit.
We're sick of it. It's time to do something, and as educators, one constructive thing we know how to do is to teach people. So, the aim of this course is to help students navigate the bullshit-rich modern environment by identifying bullshit, seeing through it, and combatting it with effective analysis and argument.
Ich erlaube mir mal, den Lehrplan inklusive Links mal hier reinzukopieren.
Bullshit-Science auf Nerdcore (ich habe jetzt nicht gegengecheckt, was davon im Lehrplan bereits auftaucht [Harry Frankfurt is klar]):
Von P-Hacking, Clickbait-Bullshit und Schoko-Diäten
Death To Bullshit
Methods of Social Media and Bullshit
Science of pseudoprofound Bullshit-Receptivity
The Bullshit Dialogues
Harry Frankfurts „On Bullshit“ shortfilm'd
[…] Each of the lectures will explore one specific facet of bullshit. For each week, a set of required readings are assigned. For some weeks, supplementary readings are also provided for those who wish to delve deeper.
Week 1. Introduction to bullshit. What is bullshit? Concepts and categories of bullshit. The art, science, and moral imperative of calling bullshit. Brandolini’s Bullshit Asymmetry Principle.
Week 2. Spotting bullshit. Truth, like liberty, requires eternal vigilance. How do you spot bullshit in the wild? Effect sizes, dimensions, Fermi estimation, and checks on plausibility. Claims and the interests of those who make them.
Week 3. The natural ecology of bullshit.
Where do we find bullshit? Why news media provide bullshit. TED talks and the marketplace for upscale bullshit. Why social media provide ideal conditions for the growth and spread of bullshit.
Week 4. Causality One common source of bullshit data analysis arises when people ignore, deliberately or otherwise, the fact that correlation is not causation. The consequences can be hilarious, but this confusion can also be used to mislead. Regression to the mean pitched as treatment effect. Selection masked as transformation.
Week 5. Statistical traps. Base-rate fallacy / prosecutor's fallacy. Simpson's paradox. Data censoring. Will Rogers effect, lead-time bias, and length time bias. Means versus medians. Importance of higher moments.
Week 6. Data visualization. Data graphics can be powerful tools for understanding information, but they can also be powerful tools for misleading audiences. We explore the many ways that data graphics can steer viewers toward misleading conclusions.
Week 8. Publication bias. Even a community of competent scientists all acting in good faith can generate a misleading scholarly record when — as is the case in the current publishing environment — journals prefer to publish positive results over negative ones. In a provocative and hugely influential 2005 paper, epidemiologist John Ioannides went so far as to argue that this publication bias has created a situation in which most published scientific results are probably false. As a result, it’s not clear that one can safely the results of some random study reported in the scientific literature, let alone on Buzzfeed.
Week 10. The ethics of calling bullshit. Where is the line between deserved criticism and targeted harassment? Is it, as one prominent scholar argued, “methodological terrorism” to call bullshit on a colleague's analysis? What if you use social media instead of a peer-reviewed journal to do so? How about calling bullshit on a whole field that you know almost nothing about? Principles for the ethical calling of bullshit. Differences between being a hard-minded skeptic and being a domineering jerk.
Week 11. Fake news.. Fifteen years ago, nascent social media platforms offered the promise of a more democratic press through decentralized broadcasting and a decoupling of publishing from advertising revenue. Instead, we get sectarian echo chambers and, lately, a serious assault on the very notion of fact. Not only did fake news play a substantive role in the November 2016 US elections, but recently a fake news story actually provoked nuclear threats issued by twitter.
New York Times Nov. 25, 2016