Calling Bullshit

Gepostet vor 2 Monaten, 13 Tagen in #Science #Bullshit #DasGeileNeueInternet #Fake

Share: Twitter Facebook Mail

bullshit

An der Uni Washington findet demnächst das (weltweit erste?) Seminar über die Identifizierung von Bullshit statt. Jetzt ist es für uns hier eher schwierig, ein Seminar der Uni Washington zu besuchen, aber die haben auch den kompletten Lehrplan inklusive Links zu akademischen Urtexten über Bullshit und Fallstudien online gestellt.

The world is awash in bullshit. Politicians are unconstrained by facts. Science is conducted by press release. So-called higher education often rewards bullshit over analytic thought. Startup culture has elevated bullshit to high art. Advertisers wink conspiratorially and invite us to join them in seeing through all the bullshit, then take advantage of our lowered guard to bombard us with second-order bullshit. The majority of administrative activity, whether in private business or the public sphere, often seems to be little more than a sophisticated exercise in the combinatorial reassembly of bullshit.

We're sick of it. It's time to do something, and as educators, one constructive thing we know how to do is to teach people. So, the aim of this course is to help students navigate the bullshit-rich modern environment by identifying bullshit, seeing through it, and combatting it with effective analysis and argument.

Ich erlaube mir mal, den Lehrplan inklusive Links mal hier reinzukopieren.

Bullshit-Science auf Nerdcore (ich habe jetzt nicht gegengecheckt, was davon im Lehrplan bereits auftaucht [Harry Frankfurt is klar]):
Von P-Hacking, Clickbait-Bullshit und Schoko-Diäten
Death To Bullshit
Methods of Social Media and Bullshit
Science of pseudoprofound Bullshit-Receptivity
The Bullshit Dialogues
Harry Frankfurts „On Bullshit“ shortfilm'd


Calling Bullshit in the Age of Big Data

[…] Each of the lectures will explore one specific facet of bullshit. For each week, a set of required readings are assigned. For some weeks, supplementary readings are also provided for those who wish to delve deeper.

Lectures

  1. Introduction to bullshit
  2. Spotting bullshit
  3. The natural ecology of bullshit
  4. Causality
  5. Statistical traps
  6. Visualization
  7. Big data
  8. Publication bias
  9. Predatory publishing and scientific misconduct
  10. The ethics of calling bullshit.
  11. Fake news


Week 1. Introduction to bullshit. What is bullshit? Concepts and categories of bullshit. The art, science, and moral imperative of calling bullshit. Brandolini’s Bullshit Asymmetry Principle.

  • Harry Frankfurt (1986) On Bullshit. Raritan Quarterly Review 6(2)
  • G. A. Cohen (2002) Deeper into Bullshit. Buss and Overton, eds., Contours of Agency: Themes from the Philosophy of Harry Frankfurt Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Week 2. Spotting bullshit. Truth, like liberty, requires eternal vigilance. How do you spot bullshit in the wild? Effect sizes, dimensions, Fermi estimation, and checks on plausibility. Claims and the interests of those who make them.

  • Carl Sagan 1996 The Fine Art of Baloney Detection. Chapter 12 in Sagan (1996) The Demon-Haunted World


Week 3. The natural ecology of bullshit.

Where do we find bullshit? Why news media provide bullshit. TED talks and the marketplace for upscale bullshit. Why social media provide ideal conditions for the growth and spread of bullshit.


Week 4. Causality One common source of bullshit data analysis arises when people ignore, deliberately or otherwise, the fact that correlation is not causation. The consequences can be hilarious, but this confusion can also be used to mislead. Regression to the mean pitched as treatment effect. Selection masked as transformation.

Supplementary reading

  • Karl Pearson (1897) On a Form of Spurious Correlation which may arise when Indices are used in the Measurement of Organs. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 60: 489–498. For context see also Aldrich (1995).

Week 5. Statistical traps. Base-rate fallacy / prosecutor's fallacy. Simpson's paradox. Data censoring. Will Rogers effect, lead-time bias, and length time bias. Means versus medians. Importance of higher moments.

  • Simpson’s paradox: an interactive data visualization from VUDlab at UC Berkeley.
  • Alvan Feinstein et al. (1985) The Will Rogers Phenomenon — Stage Migration and New Diagnostic Techniques as a Source of Misleading Statistics for Survival in Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine

Week 6. Data visualization. Data graphics can be powerful tools for understanding information, but they can also be powerful tools for misleading audiences. We explore the many ways that data graphics can steer viewers toward misleading conclusions.

  • Edward Tufte (1983) The Visual Display of Quantitative Information Chartjunk: vibrations, grids, and ducks. (Chapter 5)

Week 7. Big data. When does any old algorithm work given enough data, and when is it garbage in, garbage out? Use and abuse of machine learning. Misleading metrics. Goodhart's law.

  • Jevin West (2014) How to improve the use of metrics: learn from game theory. Nature

Week 8. Publication bias. Even a community of competent scientists all acting in good faith can generate a misleading scholarly record when — as is the case in the current publishing environment — journals prefer to publish positive results over negative ones. In a provocative and hugely influential 2005 paper, epidemiologist John Ioannides went so far as to argue that this publication bias has created a situation in which most published scientific results are probably false. As a result, it’s not clear that one can safely the results of some random study reported in the scientific literature, let alone on Buzzfeed.

Supplementary Reading

  • Erick Turner et al. (2008) Selective Publication of Antidepressant Trials and Its Influence on Apparent Efficacy New England Journal of Medicine 358:252-260
  • Nissen et al. (2016) Publication bias and the canonization of false facts.

Week 9. Predatory publishing and scientific misconduct. Predatory publishing. Beall's list and his anti-Open Access agenda. Publishing economics. Pathologies of publish-or-perish culture.


Week 10. The ethics of calling bullshit. Where is the line between deserved criticism and targeted harassment? Is it, as one prominent scholar argued, “methodological terrorism” to call bullshit on a colleague's analysis? What if you use social media instead of a peer-reviewed journal to do so? How about calling bullshit on a whole field that you know almost nothing about? Principles for the ethical calling of bullshit. Differences between being a hard-minded skeptic and being a domineering jerk.


Week 11. Fake news.. Fifteen years ago, nascent social media platforms offered the promise of a more democratic press through decentralized broadcasting and a decoupling of publishing from advertising revenue. Instead, we get sectarian echo chambers and, lately, a serious assault on the very notion of fact. Not only did fake news play a substantive role in the November 2016 US elections, but recently a fake news story actually provoked nuclear threats issued by twitter.

r/The_Donald – r/politics = r/fatpeoplehate | Subreddit-Algebra

Großartige und hochinteressante und indeed sehr erhellende Spielerei von Trevor Martin auf FiveThirtyEight:Dissecting Trump’s Most Rabid Online Following. Die haben…

RechtsLinks 24.3.2017: Meme-Magic, The Problem With Facts, Le Pens Online Army und PC als Campus-Religion

Whitney Phillips (deren Troll-Buch hier rumliegt), Jessica Beyer und Gabriella Coleman (deren Troll-Buch hier ebenfalls rumliegt), über den Anteil der…

Epilepsie induzierendes Troll-GIF von Gericht zu „tödlicher Waffe“ erklärt

Vor ein paar Monaten bloggte ich den ersten Fall einer erfolgreichen physischen Troll-Attacke durch ein Flacker-GIF, das einen Epilepsie-Anfall bei…

Outrage is Guilt

Hochinteressantes Paper über Empörung und Schuld mit Implikationen für Callout-Culture, Virtue Signaling und Outrage-Memetik. Psychologen haben anhand der Beispiele „Sweatshop“…

The Internet Warriors

Sehr interessante Mini-Doku von Kyrre Lien, der drei Jahre lang Hater aus Comment-Sections zuhause besucht, befragt und fotografiert hat. Das…

Rechtslinks 7.3.2017: The Great Meme War, The Law of Narrative Gravity und Antifragilität am Beispiel von r/The_Donald

(Pic: Molly Crabapple, „Our country is in good hands“) The Atlantic: The Clickbait Presidency – The Donald Trump conspiracy-theory feedback…

RechtsLinks 4.3.2017: Weaponized Narratives, Humpty Dumpty der Political Correctness und die Paleo-Conservatives for Porn

Sehr interessante Studie von Columbia Journalism Review über unterschiedliche Verhaltensmuster bei der Nutzung von hyper-partisan Websites: Study: Breitbart-led right-wing media…

Smart Condom 👌👈

Das intelligente Gummi von British Condoms kann man nun vorbestellen und ist eigentlich eher ein Cockring mit Accelerometer, der misst:…

Media-Company owns Fake-News-Sites for every Bias

Die logische Konsequenz aus Outrage-Memetik, Clickbait und Fake-News: Liberal Society und Conservative 101 sind zwei Media-Websites für Fake-News und gehören…

Die Ästhetik der Alt-Right

Ich hatte am vergangenen Wochenende in meinen RechtsLinks zwei Texte, die ich nochmal einzeln hervorheben will, da sie mir zur…

Fuckopoulos fucks up

Zu Fuckopoulos Downfall ist es recht nützlich zu wissen, dass es vor den Veröffentlichungen der Videos Ankündigungen auf Mailinglisten gab…