Anonymous to NATO: Leave Anon alone, or else…

Gepostet vor 6 Jahren, 2 Monaten in #Misc #Politics #Anonymous

Share: Twitter Facebook Mail

Nachdem die NATO Anonymous als eher gefährlichen Verein eingestuft hat, drohen die jetzt wiederum der NATO. (via Gizmo)

[update] Da der Server von Anonnews derzeit völlig überlastet ist, hier der komplette Text (danke daMax!):

Greetings, members of NATO. We are Anonymous.

In a recent publication, you have singled out Anonymous as a threat to "government and the people". You have also alleged that secrecy is a 'necessary evil' and that transparency is not always the right way forward.

Anonymous would like to remind you that the government and the people are, contrary to the supposed foundations of "democracy", distinct entities with often conflicting goals and desires. It is Anonymous' position that when there is a conflict of interest between the government and the people, it is the people's will which must take priority. The only threat transparency poses to government is to threaten government's ability to act in a manner which the people would disagree with, without having to face democratic consequences and accountability for such behaviour. Your own report cites a perfect example of this, the Anonymous attack on HBGary. Whether HBGary were acting in the cause of security or military gain is irrelevant - their actions were illegal and morally reprehensible. Anonymous does not accept that the government and/or the military has the right to be above the law and to use the phoney cliche of "national security" to justify illegal and deceptive activities. If the government must break the rules, they must also be willing to accept the democratic consequences of this at the ballot box.We do not accept the current status quo whereby a government can tell one story to the people and another in private. Dishonesty and secrecy totally undermine the concept of self rule. How can the people judge for whom to vote unless they are fully aware of what policies said politicians are actually pursuing?

When a government is elected, it is said to "represent" the nation it governs. This essentially means that the actions of a government are not the actions of the people in government, but are actions taken on behalf of every citizen in that country. It is unacceptable to have a situation in which the people are, in many cases, totally and utterly unaware of what is being said and done on their behalf - behind closed doors.

Anonymous and WikiLeaks are distinct entities. The actions of Anonymous were not aided or even requested by WikiLeaks. However, Anonymous and WikiLeaks do share one common attribute: They are no threat to any organization - unless that organization is doing something wrong and attempting to get away with it.

We do not wish to threaten anybody's way of life. We do not wish to dictate anything to anybody. We do not wish to terrorize any nation.

We merely wish to remove power from vested interests and return it to the people - who, in a democracy, it should never have been taken from in the first place.
The government makes the law. This does not give them the right to break it. If the government was doing nothing underhand or illegal, there would be nothing "embarassing" about Wikileaks revelations, nor would there have been any scandal emanating from HBGary. The resulting scandals were not a result of Anonymous' or Wikileaks' revelations, they were the result of the CONTENT of those revelations. And responsibility for that content can be laid solely at the doorstep of policymakers who, like any corrupt entity, naively believed that they were above the law and that they would not be caught.

A lot of government and corporate comment has been dedicated to "how we can avoid a similar leak in the future". Such advice ranges from better security, to lower levels of clearance, from harsher penalties for whistleblowers, to censorship of the press.

Our message is simple: Do not lie to the people and you won't have to worry about your lies being exposed. Do not make corrupt deals and you won't have to worry about your corruption being laid bare. Do not break the rules and you won't have to worry about getting in trouble for it.

Do not attempt to repair your two faces by concealing one of them. Instead, try having only one face - an honest, open and democratic one.

You know you do not fear us because we are a threat to society. You fear us because we are a threat to the established hierarchy. Anonymous has proven over the last several years that a hierarchy is not necessary in order to achieve great progress - perhaps what you truly fear in us, is the realization of your own irrelevance in an age which has outgrown its reliance on you. Your true terror is not in a collective of activists, but in the fact that you and everything you stand for have, by the changing tides and the advancement of technology, are now surplus to requirements.

Finally, do not make the mistake of challenging Anonymous. Do not make the mistake of believing you can behead a headless snake. If you slice off one head of Hydra, ten more heads will grow in its place. If you cut down one Anon, ten more will join us purely out of anger at your trampling of dissent.

Your only chance of defeating the movement which binds all of us is to accept it. This is no longer your world. It is our world - the people's world.

We are Anonymous.
We are legion.
We do not forgive.
We do not forget.
Expect us...

4chan R.I.P. (sort of) (UPDATE: Pharma-Bro wants to buy)

Vor einem Jahr hatte Christopher m00t Poole sein 4chan an Hiroyuki Nishimura verkauft, dem Gründer des japanischen Vorbilds 2chan. Der…

Anonymous Analytics hack Financial Reports

Es gibt anscheinend eine so mittelneue („founded in 2011“) Untergruppe des Anonymous Kollektivs, AnonAnalytics, die sich Daten von dubiosen Unternehmen…

Anon battles Daesh or what?

Eine der nervigsten Meldungen nach den Anschlägen auf Paris war der „Anonymous declares War on [Daesh]“-Nonsense. Tatsächlich läuft #OPIsis bereits…

moot sells 4chan

Christopher Poole hat 4chan an Hiroyuki Nishimura für einen unbekannten Betrag verkauft, Gründer von 2Channel, dem japanischen Vorbild: „It is…

Why m00t left 4chan

Christopher „m00t“ Poole hat mit dem Stone über seinen Ausstieg bei 4chan („The dark heart of the internet“, New York…

moot quits

Christopher „moot“ Poole hat anscheinend keinen Bock mehr auf 4Chan und hört auf. Ich vermute mal, dass der Mann ganz…

Anonymous hacked KKKs Tweeties

Anon took the Tweeties away: The internet activist group Anonymous has responded to Twitter taunts from the Ku Klux Klan…

NSA vs Wikileaks, Piratebay and Anonymous

Glen Greenwalds Snowden-Mag The Intercept berichtet aus einem neuen NSA-Dokument, das beschreibt, wie Geheimdienste den Unterstützern von Wikileaks hinterhergeschnüffelt haben…

Pic from an Anonymous-Sweatshop

@ManifestoEditor: „Really truly #Anonymous“. (via Gawker) [update] Das Bild stammt aus einem brasilianischen Artikel über eine Anon-Masken-Fabrik bei Rio, hier…

Anonymous leaks PRISM-Docs

Anonymous hat Dokumente zu PRISM geleakt, die anscheinend besagen, dass es neben der massenhaften Bespitzelung praktisch aller Social Networks auch…

Anonymous hacks North Koreas Twitter, Flickr, Social Networks

Anon legen sich mit Nord-Korea an. Bis gestern beschränkten sich die Attacken noch auf das in China gehostete Uriminzokkiri-Social Network,…