Trackt die RIAA Raubkopierer mit Last.FM Scrobble-Daten? (UPDATE: Techcrunch talking Bullshit)

[update] LastFMs Antwort auf ihrem Blog:

do us a favour – if you see people spreading the rumour, refer them to this blog post and mention you heard from a friend that “Techcrunch are full of shit.”

[update] So wie es aussieht, ist die ganze Geschichte Bullshit von Techcrunch. Aus den Kommentaren bei LastFM (Danke Felix!):

I'd like to issue a full and categorical denial of this. We've never had any request for such data by anyone, and if we did we wouldn't consent to it.

Of course we work with the major labels and provide them with broad statistics, as we would with any other label, but we'd never personally identify our users to a third party - that goes against everything we stand for.

As far as I'm concerned Techcrunch have made this whole story up.

Das neue U2-Album, das Anfang März erscheint, ist ins Internet geleakt. So weit, so langweilig. Nun haben die Anwälte der RIAA anscheinend bei Last.FM Daten aus ihrem Scrobble-Service, mit dem man auf dem Rechner gehörte Songs automatisch ins Profil eintragen kann, angefragt (und nach Insider-Infos auch bekommen). Das Web2.0-Copyright-Massaker hat grade eben begonnen, Snip von Techcrunch:

That leaked U2 album is causing all sorts of trouble. The unreleased album, which is due out on March 3, found its way onto BitTorrent and was downloaded hundreds of thousands of times. That, apparently, sent music industry lawyers over at the Recording Industry Association of America into a fit. As a result, word is going around that the RIAA asked social music service for data about its user’s listening habits to find people with unreleased tracks on their computers. And, which is owned by CBS, actually handed the data over to the RIAA. According to a tip we received:

I heard from an irate friend who works at CBS that recently provided the RIAA with a giant dump of user data to track down people who are scrobbling unreleased tracks. As word spread numerous employees at were up in arms because the data collected (a) can be used to identify individuals and (b) will likely be shared with 3rd parties that have relationships with the RIAA.

Supposedly, the operations team which handed over the data in the first place weren’t told the true purpose for the transfer or who was getting the data until after the fact, and only when they had to help with some corrupted data. It sounds like it was more of a corporate decision. I’ve contacted both CBS and the RIAA. Most of the team is in London, where the weekend has already started. For now says: “To our knowledge, no data has been made available to RIAA.” (The RIAA declined to comment).

Did Just Hand Over User Listening Data To the RIAA?